Sunday, February 21, 2016
ringing true: knights templar and egyptian myth
As we've made our way through Ishmael Reed's Mumbo Jumbo, I'll admit, I haven't been the best about using the Internet to corroborate many of the supposed facts that have been important parts of the novel. But, after reading both chapters 52, which were based so completely on Egyptian myth and subsequent histories, I decided it was time to look up some of Reed's historical claims. Quick Wikipedia searches revealed a surprising amount of accuracy between the book and the historical truth.
First, PaPa LaBas' story about Osiris and Set lines up fairly well with something known as the Osiris myth, which underlies most of ancient Egyptian mythology. In it, Set (the Egyptian god of disorder and violence, who is also associated with the sun god Ra, and his sun, Aten/Aton) is jealous of his brother. The source of this jealousy is slightly different though, since in the traditional myth, it arises over a supposed affair between Osiris and Set's wife Nephthys, while in Reed's story, it comes out of a dislike for Osiris' beloved dancing. In the original myth, Set then throws Osiris into the Nile, drowns him, and cuts him up into pieces that are then spread throughout Egypt -- a story which is quite similar to Reed's. Next in the myth, cult centers for Osiris arise everywhere where the pieces of his corpse end up, and Mumbo Jumbo follows this narrative as well, having people begin to worship Osiris when they begin seeing him ("a backbone, or a toe or an arm") in the land after his death.
I also did a search on Atonism, and according to Wikipedia, Amenhotep IV is the founder of "Atenism," where the deified sun of Ra (Aten) became the focus of this monotheistic religion. The same Amenhotep is mentioned in Mumbo Jumbo, though only as someone who popularized a religion that Set created. Historically, Atenism was thought to have been crushed by the pharaoh Horemheb. Though, as we have seen in Reed's novel, the religion went underground and flourished in Western civilization.
Much later, the Knights Templar began to thrive in Europe's Middle Ages. This aspect of the novel (or parts of it), fell close to the historical narrative as well. King Philip IV of France, indeed went in debt to the Templar and forced the Pope Clement V to put them on trial. The members of the Templar were then accused of being "enemies of the faith." Like in Reed's story, they were burned at the stake, and their abrupt dissolution gave rise to the superstitions that surround the organization today, and those that Reed played with in his novel.
Though there were many similarities between the fact and the fiction, there are some clear deviations between Reed's story and that found in the history textbooks. There are no records of Osiris being a dancer, the Knights Templar didn't seem to be "filthy ruffians" who let the clothes "rot off their back," but are said to have been wealthy and powerful men wearing "pure white mantles," etc. I'm pretty sure these are details that Reed put in to create a narrative arc that would connect the different aspects of his story. They also paint certain characters and organizations as more sympathetic or less favorable, depending on how Reed felt he should depict African versus European culture. Nevertheless, the connections between Mumbo Jumbo and the historical record are striking, and in his novel, Reed creates an alternate history -- his own conspiracy theory -- which I think is pretty convincing, and definitely worth a closer look.
*** An after note: While researching the Osiris myth, I found that the ancient Egyptians, like many of the characters in Mumbo Jumbo, believed that "written words had the power to affect reality." This caused them to avoid writing about the specifics of Osiris' death, but reminded me of the way that Jes Grew had found its power in the Book of Thoth. Thus, it seems like this idea of a movement finding 'its Text' is another example of Reed drawing on historical beliefs.***
Woah, the Atenism thing kind of blew my mind. Good observations, Iuls. I also found it interesting that Reed claimed that Isis became the Virgin Mary in the minds of Julian's people. While I haven't found this idea in any official history text books, Reed doesn't seem to the only one who's entertained it. I skimmed over a couple of (admittedly very iffy) websites that claimed that Isis is too similar (in her maternity and importance) to Mary, and her son, Horus, too similar to Jesus for the figures to be unrelated. Reed makes Jesus Osiris, though, not Horus, so again he's not following actual historical theories very closely.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Natalie; the Atenism is really cool...it puts the Knights/Atonism into so much more context. It's interesting to see how Reed put his own twists on this story. About the rivalry between Osiris and Set: the dancing and it's consequences were major causes for Set's dislike of Osiris, but the Reed does still include the wife-conflict. At some point we learn that Set is also jealous of Osiris marrying their sister Isis, so Reed basically takes the Nephthys story and turns it on its head. Instead of the more ambiguous feeling of the original story, Reed firmly sticks Set as the bad guy here...which I suppose eventually leads to (like you mentioned) Reed's intentions in depicting European vs. African culture.
ReplyDeleteWhat an interesting post! I also haven't been doing a great job of checking up on the historical accuracy of things, but your research is really helpful in understanding how Reed connects his novel to non-fictional events and concepts. This inserted narrative stuck out for me, since Reed writes in a more modern style. For instance, characters speak with words that probably wouldn't have been used at that point in time. I think Reed is doing this mostly to make the story more interesting to the readers, since this information is geared towards us for understanding the origins of Jes Grew.
ReplyDeleteI actually just looked up the Osiris myth, and I agree with you, it's kind of surprising how accurate Reed's depictions are. Of course there is still some fiction, since Reed makes characters from different religions interact with one another, etc, but knowing all of this makes Mumbo Jumbo seem more historical/mythological rather than fictional, and it kind of makes me view the book a bit differently.
ReplyDeleteVery cool, and helpful Iulianna! While reading the book I also couldn't help but think of the story of Cain and Abel from the Torah/ Bible, in relation to Set and Osiris. Cain, like Set, is jealous of his brother's agricultural abilities. However, Cain is a crop farmer and Abel is a shepherd. God is better pleased by Abel's offering of animals than Cain's offering of grain, though the text is pretty ambiguous about why. Perhaps Abel had more of the "jes Grew" spirit and maybe he was a dancer, who knows? =) Cain ends up killing Abel out of jealousy, and Cain's line lives on though his agricultural abilities are even further diminished. It seems like Abel's tradition would have died with him but the Isrealites later on continue to practice pastoralism. So somehow his legacy lives on.
ReplyDelete